The SSPP (Society for Social and Political Philosophy) was founded to promote debate and scholarship in social and political philosophy through meetings, events, and publications. For more information regarding the SSPP and its mission, please see its Constitution.

Article I: Name and Aims
1. The Society shall be called the Society for Social and Political Philosophy: Historical, Continental, and Feminist Perspectives

2. The aims of the Society shall be:
i. To raise the interest and promote the scholarship in Social and Political Philosophy from historical, continental, and feminist perspectives through meetings, events, and publications. “Historical” is understood as encompassing textual, interpretative, and discursive analyses not limited to Marxist, Hermeneutic, Genealogical, Post-Colonial, and other approaches. “Continental” is understood in the broadest possible terms as inclusive of the encounters between European, Latin American, Asian, and African systems of thought and philosophical practices. “Feminist” is intended here to include anything that privileges sex, gender, and queer identities in approaching social and political relations.

ii. To provide a forum for interested scholars from various disciplines, orientations, and training, to engage in issues in and around Social and Political Philosophy approached from historical, continental, and feminist perspectives. Such a forum would be exclusively educational, literary, and scientific within the meaning of Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (or the corresponding section of any future United States Internal Revenue Law).

iii. To provide support for scholars and researchers in the humanities and the social sciences interested in exploring Social and Political Philosophy from historical, continental, and feminist perspectives when and where possible and appropriate.

iv. To represent the interest of members of the Society and to further the aims of the Society within professional organizations, congresses, centers, or associations, national and international, in the fields of the humanities and the social sciences.

Article II. Membership
1. Membership is open to any person interested in the aims and activities of the Society.

2. Membership is open to interdisciplinary researchers, including researchers in the fields of the social sciences, the arts, and the humanities.

3. Membership is not limited to those individuals holding academic degrees or positions.

4. Membership is charged at an annual fee differentially applied to employed and unemployed members as well as to members from the core (first world) and members from the periphery (third world).

5. Members should try their best to attend the Annual Meetings of the Society that will be held yearly at a specified site, such as at an annual meeting of a national or international professional association in the humanities or the socials sciences. In case members cannot attend the Annual Meeting of the Society, they should try to be “officially represented” by communicating issues of concern to a member of the Executive Board at least one week before the meeting, or by communicating the name of a proxy and providing a written and signed affidavit to that effect to a  member of the Executive Board at least one week before the meeting.

Article III. Executive Officers
1. The executive officers of the Society shall be five members of the “Executive Board” elected for terms of two years at the Annual meeting of the Society by a majority of members present (or officially represented through a signed affidavit communicated to a member of the Executive board at least one week before the meeting and that either communicates a vote on one or more issues or assigns a proxy for a vote on one or more issues). One board member will be appointed “Secretary General” by Executive Board and will take on major administrative tasks. All executive decisions need to be taken by a majority of the Executive Board, through decision-making processes coordinated and implemented by the Secretary General.

2. Nominations for the Executive Board must be received by the both the Secretary General and the Executive Committee at least 30 days prior to the Annual Meeting of the Society in order to be put to a vote at the Annual Meeting.

3. The executive officers shall have the authority and responsibility to oversee the administration of the Society, including a) organizing and administering all aspects pertaining to annual meetings, conferences, panels, and publications of the Society; b) collecting and disbursing funds related to the membership and the overall activities of the Society; c) coordinating communication and cooperation between members of the Society, as well as with members of other societies, organizations, or groups, national or international; c) ensuring that all members are informed of, and consulted on, issues of relevance to the membership at large; d) and arranging for adequate ways for members to participate in decision-making processes and in providing support for, recommendations to, and critical assessments of, the Society’s activities and/or the Executive Board.

Article IV. Finance
1. The Society is financed by membership fees, university and other grants, fund raising and donations. The Secretary General collects dues and acts as treasurer of the Society. All the money belonging to the Society shall only be used in pursuance of the aims stated above and in accordance with the statutes of section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (and its subsequent provisions).

Article V. Constitution
1. Amendments to the Constitution may be proposed by fifty-one percent of members attending an Annual Meeting of the Society (including members officially represented as above), provided that the text of the proposed amendment has been communicated to all members at least 30 days before the Annual meeting. The constitution may be amended by a two-thirds majority vote of members attending the Annual Meeting (including members officially represented as above), provided the amendments are proposed and passed as prescribed above.

My Piano Moving Experience

First off, many people don’t know that I’m a pianist at heart. I grew up playing the piano and seriously considered pursuing it before I felt to go into Law. There’s also a lot more money in law obviously but I still love music and my piano. Here’s what I’ve discovered. Many moving companies in general make difficult and pricey to move a piano. But the Piano Movers of Boston are experts who took all my worries away from moving my piano. Still, many individuals hesitate to call expert piano movers since they mistakenly believe the cost for piano moving is considerably substantial, or the piano movers won’t appear punctually. To prevent issues such as these, always utilize professional piano movers.

I’ll get straight to it and leave their contact details below.


Piano Movers of Boston

67 Kemble St Ste 5

Boston, MA 02119


Ask for Paul, he was really helpful. Here’s a picture of my baby grand piano!

The piano movers aren’t just specialized in piano shipping, but they could also move different instruments, such as drum sets and different large instruments that need special handling. At Piano Movers of Boston, we realize your piano can be a delicate instrument and a lovely object of furniture. Moving a piano is normally best achieved by professional piano movers since it is a reasonably touchy organization. Moving a piano all on your own might not be possible.

Piano moving requires special wisdom and skills. Technique is essential in moving a piano, not merely brute strength.

At the similar time, each piano differs, and every manufacturer unique. You can frequently determine the precise class of piano you’ve got by taking the measurements of the piano. Then you have to ready the piano. What if you had an extremely expensive piano.

It is possible to not muscle a piano. So, once the amount of people needed on your own crew was determined (this relies upon piano size as well as weight and when any true piano carrying is usually to be done which will be further discussed), the very first thing they will need to do with an upright piano is always to mount this up onto a dolly.

Sociological Meaning of Industrial Society

Its definition and difference from Pre and Post-Industrial Societies

pre-industrial societyWhen technologies of bulk production are utilized to make huge volumes of goods in manufacturing works, then, we coined it an industrial society. This is the convenient means of fabrication and planner of social living. Henceforth, industrial society is also about social organization intended to upkeep the operations of any factory mass production. It’s structured hierarchically by class and features a secure partition of toil amongst labors and factory possessors.

Comprehensive Meaning

post-industrial society

In the history, there are various West’s societies including US that became industrial societies after the Industrial Revolution in the late 1700s across Europe and US. As a matter of fact, the changeover from what were agricultural or trade-based pre-Industrial societies to industrial societies became the emphasis of fundamental social science and inspired the exploration of the instituting intellectuals of sociology, comprising of Karl Marx, Émiel Durkheim, Max Weber, and among others.

Karl MarxEmile DurkheimMax Weber

Marx displayed a keen interest in digging deeper on how a capitalist economy systematized industrial fabrication. He also explored how the changeover from premature capitalism to industrial capitalism restructured the social and political assembly of society. After learning Europe and Britain’s industrial societies, Marx discovered that they highlighted hierarchies of influence that correlated with what part a person frolicked in the course of fabrication, or class status, (worker versus owner), and that political verdicts were completed by the governing class to preserve their economic welfares inside this system.

Meanwhile, Durkheim focused in dealing with how folks perform various roles and accomplish diverse purposes in a complex, industrial society, which they called as a partition of labor. He believes that such a society is wrought much like an organism and that the various portions of it have been adapted to variations in others to preserve constancy.

Amongst other things, Weber’s principle and investigation focused on how the mishmash of technology and commercial order that categorized industrial societies eventually became the chief directors of society and social life. And it has limited our free and imaginative thinking as well as our choices and actions. He denoted to this spectacle as “the iron cage.”

Considering all these theories and studies, sociologists trust that in industrial societies, all other features of it such as education, politics, media, and law work to upkeep the fabrication goalmouths of that society. In a capitalist perspective, they also labor to sustain revenue goals of the trades of that society.

Nowadays, the United States is not an industrial society anymore. The globalization of the capitalist economy that played out from the year 1970s onward has intended that most shop manufacturing that was formerly located in the U.S. was enthused abroad. Since then, China became a major industrial society, now even raised to as “the world’s factory,” because so much of the global economy’s industrial fabrication takes place there.

The United States and various other westerners can now be deliberated as post-industrial societies, where amenities, assembly of vague goods, and consumption energy the economy.